PDA

View Full Version : Which solder formulation should I use?



Penfold
04-03-2008, 01:00 PM
Right now I have a dilemma. I have heard that lead free solder, solder containing silver, and the leaded solders are good and bad in their own respects. Just out of curiousity, what does the DIYC community use?

Also there is a possibility of getting my hands on 93% pure silver solder.

I have 93% tin, 4% silver I got from Radio Shack a while back that has a flux core, but I am not sure how this will solder as I have never used this.

grages
04-03-2008, 04:42 PM
This is what I bought.

Part Number: 4900-227G

M.G. Chemicals designed its no clean Lead-Free Solder with Sn/Ag/Cu (Tin/Silver/Copper) alloys as a lead-free alternative for the standard Tin and Lead solder. These alloys conform to and exceed the impurity requirements of J-Std-006 and all other relevant international standards such as RoHS.
Lead free
Complies with RoHS
Exceeds the impurity requirements of J-Std-006
No Clean flux
21 Gauge, 0.032 “ diameters
Excellent wettability
Hard non-conductive residues Flux Percentage
M.G. Chemicals Lead Free Solder utilizes a state-of-the-art automatic wire extrusion and wire drawing machines to manufacture consistent solder. The introduction of flux core in the wire extrusion process involves constant monitoring of flux percentage to ensure minimal flux voids and irregular wire. Typical flux percentage for our Lead Free Solder is 2.0-4.0%.
Flux Core
A unique flux system was specifically used for high temperature lead free alloys. It provides the fluxing activity levels that promote fast wetting action and maximum wetting spread. Utilizing synthetically refined resin and very effective activator that wets and spreads like an RA type. This special activator exhibits virtually no spattering. Activator conforms to J-STD-004, REL0.Cleaning Flux core is a no clean formulation therefore the residues do not need to be removed for typical applications.



Other Related Products:
Circuit Specialists Inc. - 220 S Country Club Drive #2 Mesa, AZ 85210
Phone: 800-528-1417 / 480-464-2485 Fax: 480-464-5824 Email: jr@cir.com

g2ktcf
08-03-2009, 04:26 AM
I keep seeing these post pop up...but did you guys every try this? I am in the UK currently and it looks like I left my 60/40 at home. The only local supply looks to be lead free (Tin/Copper).

Any feedback on how this melts and flows?

Thanks,
Chris

omzig
08-03-2009, 10:53 AM
Personally, I wouldn't use the lead-free unless I had no other choice. It has a much higher melting point than leaded solders. The irons that they make for lead-free solder have a better rebound rate so that they can keep the tip hot enough. Then there is always the problem of tin whiskers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisker_%28metallurgy%29) with lead-free solders. This was one of reasons for adding lead to solder in the first place. I wonder how much of a problem this is going to be in Europe years down the road now that lead solder is prohibited.

I have tried several formulations and IMO by far the best performance is from 63/37 Sn/Pb. It melts easier and hardens immediately after removing the heat. 60/40 Sn/Pb is next best. I bought a case of 60/40 real cheap a while back when a electronics store was going out of business, so that's what I've been using for years now. I would be using 63/37 if I didn't have so much 60/40 on hand.

The 93% silver solder would be fine if you are soldering with a torch! The only real benefit in using it would be strength or high temperature applications, neither of which is the case with what we do.

ukewarrior
08-03-2009, 01:09 PM
I completely agree with Don.

I have found lead free solder to be hard to use, hard to flow, and certainly requires higher temperatures.

This may be fine for the professional industry, but none of these traits are good for the hobbyist.

ErnieHorning
08-03-2009, 02:00 PM
I only use lead free solder professionally at work because we are required to follow the ROHS spec. I hate it! It does require a bit more heat, but it doesn’t tolerate it for very long. You have to get it to melt and flow very quickly or it looks like a cold solder joint. I find that it doesn’t hold nearly as well either. It takes much less force to tear a part off the board.

Whiskers can be a problem. I do a lot of environmental testing at work. I know for a fact that I can get whisker growth to form by freezing a board and the placing it in a warm humid environment while the board is powered up. I can short out a board in as little as 10 minutes. If you live in a cold climate, it’s possible to have frost form on your board at night and melt from the sun in the morning and have condensation momentarily form on the board. It may take a few repeats of this for a problem to occur. If it’s in a high current area, it will go away like a miniature fuse. If not, it can eventually cause a problem.

I make my own boards and I find that lead free is especially troublesome on bare copper. You need the higher heat to melt the solder, but the higher heat also causes the copper to oxidize very fast so that the solder won’t adhere.

I have a lifetime stock of 60/40 at home. I prefer this over any kind of lead free any day.

BTW, your government that imposed this on all of us doesn’t use it. All military circuit boards are still required to be soldered with lead solder. Even if they purchase off the shelf equipment, it has to be made with lead solder. It’s getting harder to get tin/lead parts for military manufacturing.

The original reason for switching was to prevent lead contamination of the ground and potentially of drinking water. This was apparently was government BS with little verification. Independent testing found that the lead does not dissolve and leach into the ground. It stays right where it was. Lead was also much easier to recycle than no lead. Now we’re stuck with it and it’s problems.

ukewarrior
08-03-2009, 03:23 PM
So, while we are talking about it,

Anyone find any clearance deals on spools of solder anywhere?

ErnieHorning
08-03-2009, 06:32 PM
This ought to do it.:-D
http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/1ZHW8

kostyun
08-03-2009, 06:54 PM
I think I might try to head to grainger tommorow!

Wayne J
08-03-2009, 08:09 PM
I really like the 63/37, I have some lead free, but I don't know why I keep it around, I tried it once and will will never use it.

omzig
08-03-2009, 08:23 PM
This ought to do it.:-D
http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/1ZHW8.31" diameter? That's a bit big isn't it?

kostyun
08-03-2009, 08:31 PM
.31" diameter? That's a bit big isn't it?

Good catch! Work better on stained glass than PCB's!

kostyun
08-03-2009, 08:38 PM
This might be a better choice for PCBs! I personally have always liked working with the silver bearing solder

http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/1ZHW4

omzig
08-03-2009, 08:39 PM
Good catch! Work better on stained glass than PCB's!I'm wondering if it's supposed to be .031 (1/32). I've never heard of .31" solder for electronic use (which the text says it's for).

Wayne J
08-03-2009, 08:42 PM
.31" diameter? That's a bit big isn't it?


Good catch! Work better on stained glass than PCB's!


I'm wondering if it's supposed to be .031 (1/32). I've never heard of .31" solder for electronic use (which the text says it's for).

Which is why they can't move it. I would bet it is a typo also.

kostyun
08-03-2009, 08:46 PM
I may go ask to take a look at it tommorow! The local grainger is not to far from me - but - I want some of the silver solder also. Hopefully I'm feeling up to it!

ukewarrior
08-03-2009, 10:33 PM
There is no way that solder is .31 of an inch !

One third of an inch ??!!!??

If it IS .031, that is one heck of a deal !

n1ist
08-03-2009, 10:44 PM
It looks pretty thick in the photo, but not .31"...

ErnieHorning
08-04-2009, 12:01 AM
Hmm… Sorry about that.:( I’ve got a feeling that it’s really .31 inch. Grainger does list a couple of .031 inch rolls but it shows no price, so they’re probably out. I can see needing .31 inch for RF antenna building or something that would need a lot of solder. You’re not going to be melting this stuff with a 25 watt iron though.

The one that Frank linked to looks to be the next best price. A 1 pound roll is typically at least $20 so this is still a really good deal.

kostyun
08-04-2009, 12:12 AM
Drillspot sells the same kester part # - and it looks like .31" also.

http://www.drillspot.com/products/346358/Kester_Solder_24-6337-5427_Flux_Cored_Wire_Solder

omzig
08-04-2009, 01:24 AM
Drillspot sells the same kester part # - and it looks like .31" also.

http://www.drillspot.com/products/346358/Kester_Solder_24-6337-5427_Flux_Cored_Wire_Solder

I still don't believe it. That's 5/16". I guess you need get out your 1" diameter iron tip to use it.

ErnieHorning
08-04-2009, 10:01 AM
Light 'er up!:p

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4328/largesolderingiron.jpg

dirknerkle
08-04-2009, 01:04 PM
I still don't believe it. That's 5/16". I guess you need get out your 1" diameter iron tip to use it.

I've seen auto body repair folks use products like that with a torch to add metal bulk to fenders, side panels, etc. It's faster than using Bondo or other chemically cured compounds to fix cars. So yeah, they need big solder!!!

ErnieHorning
08-04-2009, 01:31 PM
I've seen auto body repair folks use products like that...That’s how the factories used to fill in the seams. Like you said, it was faster.

Now robots can do a better job arc welding it.

omzig
08-04-2009, 04:27 PM
I've seen auto body repair folks use products like that with a torch to add metal bulk to fenders, side panels, etc. It's faster than using Bondo or other chemically cured compounds to fix cars. So yeah, they need big solder!!!Yeah, but not with rosin core like this stuff is.

rstehle
08-06-2009, 08:11 PM
Just an FYI, this is what the Solder from Grainger looks like.............
$2.67 per roll (lb.) The Photo on their site was deceiving, but it is the thin stuff we use to DIY ........
I believe they still have some left............

http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/items/1ZHW8

Matt_Edwards
08-06-2009, 08:53 PM
I think what is missing from this discussion is the fact there are three basic types of solder used in electronics ( so leave the plumbing stuff in the garage)

Lead Based
Silver loaded lead
Lead free

Each have their own specific uses. Each have different melting points.
Most people will use the typical 60/40 lead/tin solder.
Silver loaded lead was particularly important for SMD passive components ( some ceramic caps failed due to chemical leaching if I remember correctly)
Lead free is the way of the future but requires additional skill as the melting temperature is higher.

I use all three types and would recommend getting the best quality you can afford. Multicore is a good product and is available in differing sizing and with various fluxes.

Whilst it would be easy to get bog down in a technical debate, Flux is probably the most important component in solder. Using a no name solder that doesn't identify the flux used is akin to play Russian Roulette. you have no idea of the long term effects.
So let me return to the Plumbing solder. this thick, some times 3mm (1/8") diam solder, works a treat in cooper pipe work. however the flux can be very aciditic. In plumbing that not a big issue for a number of reasons, internally the excess is washed away, the cooper pipe dimensions are quite big and there is little movement at the joint. When plumbing solder if used to tin multi-stranded hook up wire excess flux can be "sucked" into the wire at the insultation. Over time this acid will corrode the cooper and eventually fail.

I am rambling on, but please consider the whole product you are buying and not just get the cheapest.

KR
Matt

g2ktcf
08-07-2009, 12:52 AM
I was able to find my beloved 60/40 online here in the UK. Got some nice multi core 0.028" stuff.

My post was really more centered around the lead free items as that was the only thing available locally (at least in retail)