avatar-it
12-15-2007, 09:08 AM
)Guys.
i am currently thinking of a concept to try and develop a wireless version of the systems we have.
the system would basicly be this.
Transmitter
1. a Micro of some sort (pic micro?) attached to both the pc and a wireless transmiter to allow the commands to be transmitted to the end points.
1.1 Allow transmitting on wireless signals at or above 56k BPS
1.2 connect to either the Com port or maybe the USB port of a PC.
1.3 transmit to each device using a device ID and then the port settings.
Reciever
2. Multiple addressable recivein g transmitters. consiting of a wireless receiver , a micro (pic) and the ssr curcuit.
2.1 Addressable as an 8 bit receiving device allowing 256 differnt recievers. Allowing the transmitter to send signals that would be recieved by each device but only executed on the intended reciever.
2.2 have different versions depending on if you needed to control AC, DC etc.
2.3 allow for upto say 8 outputs per receiving station. (is it worth considering 16?)
2.4 Use PWM dimming system as remotely it is possible that only a DC signal is availabe.
2.5 Able to be run on either a AC or DC signal (5-35v AC or DC) allowing for Plug pack pwer of even other sources of power (eg battery or Solar etc)
2.6 allow for either SSR built into the receiver (prefered?)or allow for connection to existing SSR units (osssr etc) (should this be 2 different receivers?)
Both transmitter and reciever should be fully public domain ( hardware and software)
anyway this is somethign i am thinking about .
why am i sharing this idea i hear yoiu ask?
well mainly because im not sure if im capable of developing the system alone.
I think wireless is a logical step in moving forward in the systems that we have, mainly because running cat 5 cabling everywhere is inconveniant and costly ( althought probably cheaper than the receivers) .
anyway i am current ly considering creating a transmitter and receiver demo that would only allow for 1 reciever to test the idea.
at this stage any thoughts either good or bad would be apreiciated.
Thanks
Peter Rogers
PS. i may edit this post to allow for future thoughts etc,
( i hope this makes sense, i have possibly had to much to drink tonignt. ill check this post again when im sober. :) )
i am currently thinking of a concept to try and develop a wireless version of the systems we have.
the system would basicly be this.
Transmitter
1. a Micro of some sort (pic micro?) attached to both the pc and a wireless transmiter to allow the commands to be transmitted to the end points.
1.1 Allow transmitting on wireless signals at or above 56k BPS
1.2 connect to either the Com port or maybe the USB port of a PC.
1.3 transmit to each device using a device ID and then the port settings.
Reciever
2. Multiple addressable recivein g transmitters. consiting of a wireless receiver , a micro (pic) and the ssr curcuit.
2.1 Addressable as an 8 bit receiving device allowing 256 differnt recievers. Allowing the transmitter to send signals that would be recieved by each device but only executed on the intended reciever.
2.2 have different versions depending on if you needed to control AC, DC etc.
2.3 allow for upto say 8 outputs per receiving station. (is it worth considering 16?)
2.4 Use PWM dimming system as remotely it is possible that only a DC signal is availabe.
2.5 Able to be run on either a AC or DC signal (5-35v AC or DC) allowing for Plug pack pwer of even other sources of power (eg battery or Solar etc)
2.6 allow for either SSR built into the receiver (prefered?)or allow for connection to existing SSR units (osssr etc) (should this be 2 different receivers?)
Both transmitter and reciever should be fully public domain ( hardware and software)
anyway this is somethign i am thinking about .
why am i sharing this idea i hear yoiu ask?
well mainly because im not sure if im capable of developing the system alone.
I think wireless is a logical step in moving forward in the systems that we have, mainly because running cat 5 cabling everywhere is inconveniant and costly ( althought probably cheaper than the receivers) .
anyway i am current ly considering creating a transmitter and receiver demo that would only allow for 1 reciever to test the idea.
at this stage any thoughts either good or bad would be apreiciated.
Thanks
Peter Rogers
PS. i may edit this post to allow for future thoughts etc,
( i hope this makes sense, i have possibly had to much to drink tonignt. ill check this post again when im sober. :) )